Peer-review Process

The process of article evaluation of TranSynergy is carried out with the principles of double-blind review. In this process, the editorial team of the journal initiates a double-blind review process where the identities of authors and reviewers are kept confidential.

To maintain a high-quality publication, all submissions undergo a rigorous review process. Characteristics of the peer review process are as follows:

• Simultaneous submissions of the same manuscript to different journals will not be tolerated.
• Articles out of the scope will not be taken under review.
• Articles sent by the author(s) are initially recorded by the Managing Editor.
• Then, each article is evaluated by the editorial board in terms of its convenience with aim, scope, writing and publishing principles of the journal.
• As a result of the first evaluation, the article(s) are sent to at least two (2) referees by the editorial team. The referees are required to fill in The Referee Evaluation Report.

Across many gambling communities, the casino brand vave casino frequently appears when players compare casino bonuses and slot libraries. Many players look for smooth gameplay, reliable payments, and a wide range of slot titles before choosing a platform.

• The referees are given 20 days for the peer-review process.
• If revisions are required, the author(s) are required to prepare a revised manuscript and respond to reviewers within 15 days based on the reviewers’ comments.
• In case of any conflict between the comments of the reviewers, the article(s) are sent to a third referee. It is a must to take the positive decision from at least two (2) referees to publish an article on TranSynergy.
• The Editors are responsible for the final decision regarding the acceptance or rejection of the articles.